The JFK Assassination Files: Another Example of the ‘Psyop’ Game

INTRODUCTION

After an abundance of hype prior to the start of Trump’s second presidential term, the JFK assassination files, long withheld as 'top secret', were finally released to the public on March 18th of 2025.

Despite the promises of earth-shattering revelations, the files turned out to be an overwhelming flop.  News outlets are unanimous: the long-awaited release of the JFK documents added no new insight into the assassination, and tended to support the official narrative of what happened.

The files offer little more than the same thing we’ve always seen: a bunch of faded and disorganized documents that are barely intelligible to the reader. Scanning the documents, one quickly finds that the files suggest a few main points: 

1. That Lee Harvey Oswald was the assassin,

2. That he was a ‘lone nut’ who acted alone, and,

3. That the CIA and FBI were ‘investigating’ him, or had him ‘under observation’. 

   
   

These conclusions, quite obviously, all serve the government’s own interests.  These same conclusions had already been drawn by the Warren Commission when Congress released its report on the JFK assassination back in September 1964.

The above insights were not the mind-blowing revelations we were promised in early discussions on the release of the JFK files.  Despite years of hype about Trump going after the FBI and 'deep state,' the release of the JFK files did not succeed in dismantling any corrupt bureaucracy. Obviously, the lack of new revelations was a major let down for conspiracy theorists, who had been eagerly waiting for reform.

The JFK Files: A 'Psyop' Intended to Legitimize the Establishment

The release of the files came with no press scandal, no revelation of government conspiracy, no deep state prosecutions, no discussions of any confidential informant (CI) network that could have conspired with the intelligence agencies to perpetrate the murder. The release of the JFK files failed miserably at it's objective.

Trump himself mirrored this sentiment, commenting: “I think the papers have turned out to be somewhat unspectacular and maybe that’s a good thing.”  Trump went on to confirm the official narrative: that Oswald was the culprit, but weakly speculated that perhaps he received help. Trump did not openly endorse a ‘deep state’ conspiracy involving the intelligence agencies to murder JFK.

These results are hardly the breakthrough in ‘transparency’ that was going to set the public free from an oppressive bureaucratic deep state, which the Trump administration promised the nation throughout his campaign. 

In particular, one demographic group that was promised relief were the ‘conspiracy theorists’ and ‘targeted individuals’ demographics, who Trump pandered to using his political alliance with Infowars, and it’s owner, Alex Jones.

The Current Work

The current article answers the question: why did the JFK files fail to have their intended effect of exposing and reforming the tyrannical deep state? 

Towards this end, the current article:

1. Argues that the JFK files, long held as ‘top secret', were actually a psyop intended to reinforce the official narrative by offering no new revelations.

   
   

2. Discusses the inherent fallibility of public records and establishes an epistemological framework for using public records as evidence.

   
   

3. Uses the above framework to proffer a theory on ‘what really happened’ the day JFK was assassinated, and moreover, what motive the murder served.

The results of this inquiry support a conspiratorial viewpoint on history. The JFK assassination was an outgrowth of a historical ‘script’ that the Allied powers agreed upon after WW2. At the end of this war, it had been decided that a narrative of ‘capitalism vs. communism’ would be the driving force behind socioeconomic progress through the subsequent generation (aka, the Cold War era).

BACKGROUND: TRUMP, RFK, & THE CONSPIRACY THEORY MOVEMENT

Trump’s interest in the JFK assassination files began in the aftermath of his own experience being victim to an attempted assassination in July 2024 when Thomas Crooks is alleged to have made an attempt to gun down president Trump.

Shortly after being victim to the attempted assassination, Trump then partnered with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK), who is the nephew of John F. Kennedy (JFK).  Trump's partnership with RFK came in apparent recognition of Trump's newfound identity as a victim of an attempted assassination, which tied him to the late JFK.

The Trump/RFK partnership was a work of political brilliance. The union of a ‘right’ and ‘left’ wing politician, helped swing liberal voters onto the Trump ticket. Trump further differentiated himself from ordinary Republicans as a 'nationalist', which aligned him with far-left members of the Democratic party. The union of 'nationalists' on both sides of the political spectrum suited Trump's 'America first' platform, which focused on workers rights and the welfare of ordinary Americans.

Most importantly, however, the Trump/RFK alliance featured a common link in a key social movement: conspiracy theory.  The JFK assassination has been a long-running infatuation among conspiracy theorists, who have long alleged that the murder was an inside job involving the CIA and other intelligence agencies. 

The pervasiveness of conspiracy theories circulating about the JFK assassination suggest that RFK is probably familiar with such theories, and may even endorse such theories, including the contention that the shadow government and intelligence agencies were behind the murder of his uncle, JFK.

Likewise, Trump had long regarded his own assassination attempt as an outgrowth of his long-running targeting by the bureaucratic ‘deep state.’  These shadowy deep state bureaucrats had long opposed his presidential ambitions. The FBI repeatedly launched smear campaigns against him using liberals, the mass media, and the public at large.

The Anti-Gang Stalking Subtext within the Trump Campaign

In the press coverage surrounding his targeting, Trump complained of being victim to what he referred to as the bureaucratic 'deep state.' 

This 'deep state' to which he kept referring is in fact the socially acceptable term for the bureaucratic ‘shadow government'. The harassment to which he referred, of course, was of the sort typically experienced by victims of the federal gang stalking program, namely, the 'targeted individuals' demographic.

The deep state, acting through law enforcement, controls the DOJ’s vast network of civilian informants known as the Community Oriented Policing (COPS) program.  The deep state can mobilize such informants on the fly from a Central Command headquarters to perform targeted harassment. These informants carry out 'gang stalking' for the government to oppress dissidents, whistleblowers, crime victims, and other people labeled 'threats' to the established authority.

With the attempted assassination of Trump in July 2024, the deep state further became an object of reform. The solution to deep state misconduct? Shortly after the assassination attempt, Trump vowed to release the files on the JFK assassination. If such files were released, then the conspiracy theorists could run amok.  By exercising their first amendment right to expose the shadow government, then the FBI and CIA could be outed in the press as corrupt and reform could take place.

Trump's Real Agenda for Dismantling the Deep State

With the shadow government exposed and the intelligence agencies outed, Trump could then justify his Republican mission to further dismantle federal bureaucracy and downsize the federal government. 

After downsizing the federal government, the next step in his plan is to consolidate power by merging U.S. corporations and the federal government into a single unified entity, creating a government that favors the corporations and mega-wealthy.

With business and government interests aligned, no checks and balances exist on the profit motive. Corporations gain complete control. Then, the weaker, more corrupt, and easier-to-control state police become an oppressive arm of the corporations (on command of the 'new' political elite). The result? A tyrannical police state, consistent with a ‘fascist’ model of the political economy.

A Glimmer of Hope for Targeted Individuals

While Trump’s true motives may have been to justify downsizing the federal government and creating a government run by the corporations, there was a glimmer of hope in the darkness for the targeted individuals (TI's) movement.

Perhaps in the course of dismantling the federal government, Trump would manage to shake up federal bureaucracy enough to free the targeted individuals from the bureaucratic structures enslaving them, ultimately releasing them from their shackles.

The conspiracy theory movement overlaps with the ‘targeted individuals’ movement.  If the JFK files managed to raise enough awareness to the evils of the FBI and intelligence agencies (namely, their practice of harassment and murder of civilians), then perhaps the JFK files could be a catalyst for real change.

A ‘TOP SECRET’ PSYOP: THE DECEPTION BEHIND THE JFK FILES

When the news broke that the JFK files led to no new insights into a deep state conspiracy to murder Kennedy, reactions were mixed--

Press outlets summarizing the files expressed some suspicion towards the CIA, but didn't challenge the validity of the records outright. The mainstream media generally did the bidding of the government: reviews of the JFK files served as little more than an 'insistence' from the government that the official narrative was correct.

The conspiracy theorists, however, were outraged at the lack of revelations.  Afterall, given the hype, and the anti-deep state sentiment under Trump, many thought we were on the verge of an open confession to a government conspiracy to murder JFK.

Despite the controversy, the release of the files was a victory for the FBI. They succeeded in forcing a perception in the public's mind that the records were valid and that they could be taken at face value. The representation was that the JFK files represented a 'real' investigation: that Oswald was under legitimate criminal investigation and had no relationship to the CIA or intelligence community.

Despite the controversy, the questions no one asked were:

1. 'How can we be certain these records are even valid in the first place?'

2. 'Who made the JFK records?'

3. 'Can we really trust records created by the party that was probably behind the assassination in the first place?'

The answer to the third question guides the rest of them, and it is clearly 'no.' You would not be able to trust the person that wrote the records on a criminal investigation if they themselves were the likely perpetrator of that crime.

As a result, public records are not a valid or reliable way of knowing anything. They are not a trustworthy source of information. As a form of evidence, they lack epistemological validity as a source of knowledge.

The rest of this section discusses why public records are not reliable and valid as evidence, and then discusses the way in which they can be interpreted.

The JFK Records: a Psyop Intended to Legitimize the System

Any discerning mind could tell you that anything flaunted as ‘top secret’, such as the JFK files, is to be regarded with suspicion. 

People tend to be more trusting of things labeled ‘top secret’ because people see their disclosure as contrary to the interests of the source. Things that are forbidden further tend to be valued more highly.

What if, however, such a concept were used strategically to deceive someone into trusting a lie?  This goal is the exact purpose of a government manipulation tactic commonly referred to as the ‘psyop.’

‘Psyop’: A Definition

Within the conspiracy theory world, a psyop refers most generally to a ‘psychological operation’ run on a population to manipulate and influence them. It is similar to what is typically referred to as a set of ‘ideological’ beliefs or assumptions.

What the government does is they propagate a set of false beliefs or assumptions about the way the world works. The government then engages in all manner of manipulations that would never be possible under the belief system of the psyop.

Examples of psyops include the constitutional myth of liberty, the free market, and the invisible hand. Such myths exist to convince the public they are responsible for their own lot in life and that if anything goes wrong, it's there own fault.

In reality, the government causes the destiny of virtually all civilians through hands-on social control. When things go wrong, the victim is then blamed for misfortunes caused by the deception. When they allege otherwise, they get gaslighted. The judge tells them, “But didn’t you listen to your first grade teacher?! The theory you propose would be impossible given how society operates!”

What the FBI Really Tried to Do with the JFK Files

The release of the JFK records was an example of the above ‘psyop’ tactic for manipulating the public into trusting the government.

The FBI wants the public to think that the documents could only tell the truth. After all, how could they not if the records were withheld as top secret for so long? If the FBI and CIA really were behind the assassination, then certainly the records would show it, would they not?

After Trump made a showing of prying these records out of the DOJ’s hands, however, the JFK files revealed all the same things we had already been told: that Oswald was a lone nut that acted alone. 

The records thus amounted to an 'insistence' that the official narrative were true. But again, this begs the question: How can we trust records that are written by the very people we suspect were behind the murder in the first place?

THE FALLACY OF PUBLIC RECORDS

Despite the perception that the JFK files had value, public records are rarely ever useful.

In fact, taking public records at face value can be outright dangerous due to their intrinsic deceptiveness. Official records are not a valid, reliable, or accurate source of information about an issue. 

Historians, journalists, and political scientists make careers writing books and articles relying entirely on official records as their source of evidence. Press outlets report back statements on public records as if they were the gospel. Many innocent people that are falsely charged with crimes, for instance, have false statements about them on public records disseminated in the press, robbing them of their reputations.

Due to reliance on public records, the lies of government officials end up being processed, altered, and reconstructed into new creations, as scholars, investigators, and journalists draw false and misguided conclusions from official documents.  It is a vicious cycle that brainwashes the population, keeps the public in the dark, and renders citizens docile to the government’s interests.

How Public Records are Created

If anyone has ever witnessed the way the public officials write records one knows that they are not accurate.  

Government investigators are trained in what the government’s interests are.  If the state has a vested interest in a case, the relevant officials are told what perspective on the situation they are supposed to substantiate on the records. The state's position on the case is usually a lie, or at minimum, a misrepresentation of the true situation.

After being coached on what the government’s interests are, the investigator processes all the evidence through a frame of reference: ‘Is this statement something I can write down on the records?  'Will reporting that fact make the state look bad?' 'Will my boss be angry at me if I write this statement down on the record?’

If a particular statement or fact makes the government look bad, or runs contrary to the state’s interest, then the investigator will typically:

1. Omit the fact,

2. Misrepresent the fact,

3. Replace the fact with one or more lies, or

4. Some combination of all the above.

   
   

Public records are basically useless as a form of evidence.  They are not reliable.  Quite often, they amount to a ‘cover up’ of what really happened.  In courts of law, public records are often inadmissible as evidence under the ‘hearsay’ rule and require the author of the record to be present in court to testify.

Public records may only be deemed 'possibly' reliable if they contain statements or admissions that STRONGLY contradict the governments interests.  Even then, however, the government may be selectively engaging truth telling (or strategic self-incrimination) in order to perpetrate a more profound deception.

How Public Records Can Be Useful

We have now established that public records are basically useless as a form of evidence when they are taken at face value. 

When the records are put in the appropriate perspective, however, they can be somewhat useful in piecing together a larger picture, or mosaic, of what happened in a case, or how the world really operates.

Public records should thus be used as ‘data’ that can be used in relation to other, more reliable pieces of evidence (such as video and audio) to uncover the truth. 

Further, if the reviewer ‘reads between the lines’ on a record (while taking into account their inherent fallibility as evidence) then the truth can be more easily uncovered:

Typically, omitted facts on a record can be detected as 'holes in the story', which serve as giveaways for what really happened. Euphemisms are also used frequently by public officials to conceal misconduct on part of the state. Inconsistencies in facts and statements can also be a clue as to what really happened.

READING BETWEEN THE LINES ON THE JFK FILES

In order to draw accurate conclusion from official records, a few key guiding principles apply when analyzing evidence --

1. Words can lie: testimonial statements cannot be trusted.

2. Photographs prove something existed, but depend highly on testimony.

3. Video usually proves an event existed in reality, but could have been staged.

4. The government will not typically say something that incriminates themselves.

5. Records themselves cannot be taken at face value.

Failing to keep the above issues in mind when interpreting public records will lead to inaccurate conclusions. By heeding the above principles, records can be viewed in the appropriate perspective and accurate conclusions can be draw drawn.

The right way to interpret public records is as a form of ‘data’. The sum total of all the statements, plus points of consistency should be identified to derive certain 'big' facts that may be deemed ‘undisputable’. These undisputable facts may be considered alongside other forms of evidence to construct a theory of what really happened.

The Law Enforcement Code: Euphemisms as a Mode of Operation

Using the above lens to provide slight change in perspective, consider the prospect, however, that perhaps a government confession to the murder of JFK were right there on the surface of the JFK files. 

Consider some other sources of evidence about the way law enforcement operates--

1. It is widely recognized that law enforcement has an extensive practice of using of confidential informants (CI's), including the Community Oriented Policing (COPS) program. Why is law enforcement's informant practice not more widely applied when interpreting the JFK files?

   
   

2. Then consider law enforcement's use of euphemisms to hide more nefarious conduct. Such code is evident in their practice of 'watchlisting', which is often a euphemism for 'blacklisting,' or harassment. Why is it never recognized that perhaps the JFK files are using code, or euphemisms to conceal admissions of government misconduct?

The JFK files contain much talk about the CIA and Oswald’s possible entanglement with them. Often times, a person being 'investigated' by an agency is a euphemism for being harassed by them. Other times, being 'under investigation' means the person is an asset, or confidential informant (CI) for the agency. Other euphemisms that a person is an informant are: ‘person of interest' and ‘known to law enforcement.'

The term 'informant' itself is a euphemism for a criminal that was brought in and 'flipped', that is, recruited as an informant. In such deals, the suspect agrees to be a criminal working for the government for a get-out-of-jail free card or leniency.

If an informant is recruited at the level of the 'suspect' (prior to arrest) then there may not even be a formal paper trail created. This arrangement allows ordinary civilians to be flipped as criminal informants at the suspect level, enabling them to maintain the outward appearance of being stand-up citizens (e.g., COPS).

That said, looking at the big picture, all the pieces of evidence in the JFK files that discuss Oswald as an object of CIA scrutiny are probably admissions of his status as a CIA operative, and moreover, that the CIA was no doubt, behind the JFK assassination.

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO JFK

Taking the above methods for interpreting public records into account, we then may consider the question, ‘what really happened to JFK?’

Let’s review some key pieces of evidence, focusing only on the big facts that remain undisputable while applying circumstantial reasoning.

Was Oswald the Shooter?

Some divergent options suggest that Oswald was a ‘fall guy’ and may have been framed outright. Oswald himself, for instance, is famous for saying, “I’m just a patsy.” 

These theories aren’t quite plausible, however. His own statement that he was a patsy, for instance, could just mean that he was the one who got 'arrested' for the crime, but not that he was completely innocent in the situation.

Taking the available evidence into account, we can say that, yes, there is a good chance Oswald was at least one of the shooters. 

Using our method for interpreting public records, consider some of the few facts we know for certain—

1. It is an absolute, undisputed fact that Oswald was former military, which means he was trained as a marksman and probably had the skillset necessary to snipe the president from afar while he was in a moving vehicle.

   
   

2. Consider the sheer number of records focusing on Oswald as a subject of CIA fascination. Again, the idea that he was under observation was probably a euphemism for him being a CIA informant or asset. Then consider: why would they go through so much effort creating records on him (and investigating him afterwards) if he wasn’t, at minimum, involved in the assassination?

   
   

3. Photographs of Oswald do not match the caricature of him painted by the government. By the looks of it, he was muscular and physically adept. He appears capable of carrying out an assassination. If he were a completely innocent fall guy that was framed outright, we would expect an appearance that looked more like the awkward loser the government made him out to be.

   

   Oswald does not fit the caricature of the socially awkward loser the CIA presented him as.

Did the CIA Recruit Him?

Another issue that many people still grapple with is whether or not he was working for the CIA.  Using the above methods for analyzing records, we can say with great certainly: yes.  Oswald was no doubt working for the CIA.

1. Since Oswald was former military, he also had the 'opportunity' to be recruited by the government for the assassination. Quite simply, his military status put him in the pipeline for CIA recruitment, or espionage work within the military.

   
   

2. There is no disputing the fact that Oswald spent considerable time in the former Soviet Union where he presented himself as a communist “defector” from the U.S.  Oswald further took a trip to Mexico within the two months prior to the JFK assassination where he engaged in work suggestive of espionage, including meeting with the Soviet and Cuban embassies there.  Such facts suggest he was doing espionage work for the CIA as their asset.

   
   

3. The claim that Oswald was a ‘defector’ and a ‘Communist’ suggests he was a spy for the CIA. It's simple: informants typically have a ‘front’ or a ‘cover’ that they use when infiltrating organizations to avoid detection and remain plausible. Even if he was a genuine communist, it would have helped him maintain his front.

Did Oswald Act Alone? No, He Partook in Gang Stalking

We've now established that Oswald was plausibly the gunman, and that he was no doubt a CIA informant or asset. The question remains, did he act alone? If not, how many other people were involved?

The evidence suggests that the murder of JFK was not strictly the product of a rouge group of 'bad apples' working within the CIA. On the contrary, the evidence suggests Oswald partook in a conspiracy to murder Kennedy.

But not just any conspiracy--

Quite shockingly, the JFK assassination was the product of the government acting, as normal, as a unified gang stalking apparatus. In this instance, the federal gang stalking program churned out the murder of a U.S. president through the combined efforts of a large number of separate persons and organizations.

Consider the following facts that emerge from a ‘data-based’ reading of the evidence--

1. Prior inquiries into the assassination have found that the Secret Service was derelict in their duties on the day of the assassination. They did not appear to be taking protective measures against any assassination attempt. This fact suggests a gang stalking conspiracy by the bureaucratic ‘deep state’ to instruct the Secret Service to shirk their duties and let the assassination occur.

2. Abundant evidence suggests the involvement of other parties, including the mafia.  It has long been established that the mafia is an FBI and CIA front. It reduces to a confidential informant (CI) network. One of these mafia links was Jack Ruby who was probably ordered by the government to murder Oswald to prevent him from talking (and ratting out the whole team).

   
   

3. By the year 1965, there is compelling evidence that the government was out silencing people who attempted to uncover the truth and prove a government conspiracy to murder John F. Kennedy.

   
   

   1. A New Orleans prosecutor, Jim Garrison, opened an investigation into the assassination. He sought prosecutions against various persons over the JFK assassination, including Clay Shaw, a businessman and CIA asset. Federal agencies, however, stonewalled Garrison in his subpoenas, stopping his investigation in it’s tracks.

      
      

   2. Most strikingly about Garrison, however, is the story of what happened to him afterwards. Garrison was eventually hit by targeted persecution, commonly referred to as ‘gang stalking’. He was smeared in the press and investigated on corruption charges. When he called a private investigator to search his office for surveillance bugs, he found that this person was also a CIA snitch. Garrison then floundered in a downward spiral the rest of his life, suggesting he was targeted for elimination with gang stalking .

      
      

   3. Another figure that was silenced is George De Mohrenschildt, a CIA asset often alleged to be Oswald’s handler.  De Mohrenschildt was the chief witness accusing Oswald of the JFK murder to the Warren Commission. Upon his death, however, De Mohrenschildt changed his tune. He wrote a book titled “I am a Patsy” in which he softened his allegations towards Oswald. He does not appear to have fully exonerated Oswald, however. This fact suggests Oswald simply took the fall for a group of conspirators.

      
      

   4. After challenging the narrative, De Mohrenschildt began to encounter gang stalking.  He wrote a letter to then CIA director, George HW Bush, asking him to stop to the gang stalking.  De Mohrenschildt was met with the same gaslighting tactics we see today. Bush assured him that he was not under federal surveillance and that the harassment was probably just mass media interest in his book. De Mohrenschildt was later found dead of a shotgun blast to the head after he agreed to testify before a new congressional committee, the House Committee on Assassinations.

The takeaway here is that the gang stalking apparatus traces all the way back the 1960’s, and further, that it appears to have churned out the murder of JFK. If gang stalking existed back then (and the evidence suggests that it does) then there is no doubt that the murder of JFK was a group effort: a coordinated event involving many parties. 

Viewed in this light, we can conclude that Oswald may have been the gunman, but even if he wasn't, would it really matter? Either way, the government was behind it, and at the end of the day, Oswald was probably 'complicit', which means he was 'guilty as equals' with the real gunmen. We can say, however, that he probably was the so-called 'sacrificial lamb' that took the fall for the entire group of conspirators.

What Was the Motive for Killing JFK?

The surface justification is reported to be Kennedy’s anti-corporate, pro-communist policies, which angered the CIA and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Historically, both the CIA and CFR have served the interests of the American big business elite, creating conditions that are favorable to U.S. corporations across the world. The CIA and CHR are considered ‘globalist’ organizations. 

However, while anti-communist policies were the CIA's ‘surface justification’ for murdering JFK, there appears to be a more profound motivations:

More extreme conspiratorial views of history suggest that the ‘capitalism vs communism’ dynamic that characterized post-WW2 politics was a purposeful creation. It was intended to serve as a driving force of social change. Change itself reflected the outcomes of an economic game based on international warfare and empire building between the U.S. and former Soviet Union.

By the end of WW2, the Allied powers used a Hegelian dialectical approach when deciding how history would unfold. They needed a ‘conflict’ of some sort to serve as a coercive force of change.  It was decided that Russia would be the communist power, and that they would serve as a fictitious threat (or ‘bogey man’) that the the U.S. would use to mobilize action and push various agenda’s.

The Vietnam and Korean Wars were the first instances of this dynamic, and it is reported that both wars were scripted. In fact, for the Korean War, both the U.S. and Russian chains of command are reportedly traceable to a United Nations office: the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs.’  This department is reported to have been led by a Russian named Constantine Zinchenko. 

To this day, the same dialectical, conflict-based method characterizes historical scripts devised by the government to justify social and economic policy.  After the war on communism was won with dissolution of the USSR, the historical script quickly shifted to the ‘war on terror’.   As the war on terror began to wane, a new threat was introduced: the 'war on disease', which was introduced with the COVID-19 epidemic, and continues to present with RFK's proposed health policies under Trump.

In short, while the CIA was no doubt behind the assassination of JFK, his liberal policies were probably only a surface justification. The entire presidency was a manifestation of a historical drama that had already been written and later carried out. 

The key insight: if gang existed back then, then the government had the ability to rig the election, securing the victory JFK.  They then made a show of assassinating a radical left-wing politician with sympathies towards communism. 

When viewed in this light, the assassination of JFK was not a practical issue: it was an affirmation the anti-communist values and sentiment of the U.S. in the 1960’s. The murder of JFK was a pre-conceived event within a broader historical script.

CONCLUSION

Despite the failure of the JFK assassination files to deal a major blow to the gang stalking apparatus, the release of the JFK files appears to be just a start in a pattern of future records releases.

The release of the JFK files is part of a broader push by the Trump administration for greater transparency about government conduct. Since the release of the JFK files, there is now talk of releasing the Martin Luther King files, the NAME project, the Congressional Baseball Game shooting, and the 9/11 attacks. 

Most importantly, there is the legendary ‘Epstein Client List,’ which appears to be the most likely breakthrough disclosure that might lead to change for targeted individuals and the general public.  The Epstein scandal has been a running theme in the press for years now, and ties into numerous other criminal sex trafficking prosecutions.

We already know what the Epstein document will disclose: that pretty much everyone in a position of power was involved in sex crimes and that the FBI and CIA has all of them in their back pocket.  Such a dilemma undermines our democracy and renders the checks and balances system useless for curbing abuses of executive power.

Will it be revealed, however, that the FBI and CIA were behind Jeffrey Epstein and that they used him as their asset to collect dirt on all the politicians?  Will it be revealed that it was the corrupting influence of the FBI and CIA, plus their practice of mass slavery and extortion of the civilian population, that led Jeffrey Epstein?

Will the release of the Epstein documents serve as the catalyst for the Washington DC politicians to exert their oversight function against the FBI and dismantle the targeted individuals program, the COPS program, and free the civilian population from the tyrannical gang stalking apparatus and intelligence agencies?  

Only time will tell. 

‘Till next time.